November 23, 2017

New appraisal rules may hurt homebuyers

  

Bankrate.com

If you want to buy a home or refinance your mortgage, you might not be all that concerned about how your lender selects the appraiser who figures out how much your home is worth.  But new rules intended to reduce appraisal fraud and curtail undue pressure on appraisers could have some dramatic repercussions for homebuyers and homeowners.  Proponents say the new rules will result in more-reliable appraisals, less fraud, lower costs and minimal disruption.

But critics expect less-accurate appraisals, delays in loan processing, higher costs and general misery for all concerned.  At issue is the “Home Valuation Code of Conduct,” or HVCC, a four-page document that outlines appraisal-related practices to which lenders must adhere with respect to so-called “conventional” or “conforming” loans that they want to sell to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The code appears set to become effective May 1.

There are three main questions about the new code: Will the new rules take the pressure off appraisers? Will the new rules hinder mortgage shopping? Will the new rules make appraisals more costly?

Much of the controversy concerns how the code will affect mortgage brokers and appraisers. Both of these groups have been up in arms because they believe the new rules will curtail their business opportunities and income.

But these groups also have suggested that the new rules could result in less-accurate appraisals or higher appraisal fees, two outcomes that should raise an alarm for homebuyers and homeowners.

Here is a closer look at the issues.

Will the new rules take the pressure off appraisers?

No one disputes the axioms that property appraisals should be accurate, fair and impartial and that “inflated appraisals put both the lender and borrower in jeopardy,” says Bill Garber, director of government and external relations at the Appraisal Institute, a Chicago-based professional organization for appraisers.

But there’s still considerable disagreement over whether the new rules will put an end to the pressure, coercion and even threats that appraisers have faced to a greater or lesser degree since appraisals were invented.

The new code of conduct requires that lenders order appraisals either directly from appraisers, most of whom are independent contractors, or through appraisal management companies, which act as a sort of outsourced appraisal department for the lender.

This requirement means mortgage brokers will no longer be able to order appraisals for loans that will be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.  Garber says there is “a good case to be made” that mortgage brokers shouldn’t order appraisals because they earn their commission only if the appraiser’s opinion of value is high enough for the lender to OK the loan.

While that case may indeed be solid, an argument also can be made that “all parties to the loan transaction have some incentive to obtain an appraisal at the highest possible value,” as the Federal Trade Commission stated in a letter to Freddie Mac about the code.

Mortgage brokers want to earn that commission. Borrowers want to be able to buy the home or refinance a mortgage. Lenders want to be sure the property’s value justifies the loan amount, but also want the loan to close so they can collect the fees.

Will the new rules hinder mortgage shopping?

A major concern is whether the code’s ban on broker-ordered appraisals in connection with certain loans will impede borrowers’ ability to shop around for a loan.  Garber says borrowers will still be able to shop around with the aid of a mortgage broker because an appraisal ordered by one lender “can be utilized by other lenders with proper procedures.”

Mortgage brokers say otherwise. In a letter to Fannie Mae, George Hanzimanolis, 2007-08 president of the 25,000-member National Association of Mortgage Brokers, or NAMB, in McLean, Va., argued that the code would “impede consumers’ ability to comparison shop” for loan products.

He also said the code would have an “adverse impact” on the mortgage market that would result in “fewer choices and increased costs for consumers.”

If mortgage brokers are prohibited from ordering appraisals, consumer costs will rise, contracts will be delayed and borrowers will be stripped of one of the primary benefits of working with a mortgage broker, namely, cost-effective and timely customer service,” Hanzimanolis wrote.

The code will be “a horrible, monstrous disaster,” says Joe Metzler, a mortgage specialist at Mortgages Unlimited in St. Paul, Minn.

He says that once the code becomes effective, mortgage brokers won’t be able to speak informally to appraisers, much less order appraisals. That lack of communication could stymie some homeowners who want to refinance, but don’t know whether they have enough equity in their home to do so.

The code was “designed to prevent the fraudulent appraisals that created a lot of the mess” in the mortgage sector, Metzler says. But he adds that in his experience appraisers have already become more conservative in their valuations.

“There is no one who is willing to, ahem, sharpen their pencil,” he says.

Will the new rules make appraisals more costly?

Another major concern is whether these changes in how appraisals are ordered will increase borrowers’ costs for appraisals.  Currently, mortgage brokers order half or more of all appraisals, according to Garber.

Once they are pushed out of the process, more appraisals likely will be ordered instead by appraisal-management companies, which control approximately 20 percent of the appraisal business, according to Garber.

These companies typically aren’t paid for their services by the lender. Instead, they take a cut, which can be as much as 50 percent or more, of the appraiser’s fee.

Garber says appraisal-management companies have put substantial downward pressure on appraisers’ earnings; consequently, some experienced appraisers have exited the business.

Borrowers may be concerned about the effect of that exodus on the quality of appraisals since those who remain in the business may be only “minimally qualified,” to use Garber’s description. Appraisers may be forced to complete more appraisals more quickly due to lower fees for their services.

Plus, some appraisal-management companies are owned in part by lenders, which means the lender receives an indirect benefit from the appraisal fee. These types of affiliated business relationships among companies that provide real-estate settlement services aren’t necessarily illegal. However, federal law requires that these relationships be disclosed to homebuyers to avoid the appearance of kickbacks, which are prohibited.

The link between lenders and appraisal-management companies have triggered two lawsuits. In one, homeowners claimed that an affiliated business relationship wasn’t disclosed. In the other, homeowners claimed they were charged inflated appraisal fees due to an affiliated business relationship.

Finally, as if this set of circumstances wasn’t complicated enough, the Federal Reserve recently released its own guidelines for appraisals. Will the Fed’s “Interagency Appraisal Evaluation Guidelines” eventually trump the HVCC? Only time will tell.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company



Hire The Right Team. How Can We Assist You?

(206) 219-3088


Related content:

Leave A Reply With Facebook

comments

Comments

  1. Pressure has been greatly increased on the appraisers due to implementation of HVCC. Don’t kid yourself, the AMCs are really agents of the lenders and some have been considered “goon-squads” for the lenders who diminish the appraisers ability to approach an assignment as a neutral party in the process. This is just a repeat of the 1990s reforms. The appraisers are the scapegoats, the banks are rewarded for their malfeasance and lenders are allowed to continue to order appraisal services from their subsidiaries. Notice that the term “conflict of interest” never enters the discussion.

    No genuine reform is possible until appraisers are enabled to create objective appraisals.

  2. No genuine reform is possible until appraisers are enabled to create objective appraisals.

    • Perhaps silence is the best performance.

      • ThemortgageReel Team says:

        Some updates on the first week of Appraisal Management, as assumed the turn times on appraisals are about 10 business days out which may not be that bad. Where the consumer is now suffering is the unknown of the final cost of the appraisal. Many lenders are requiring a range to be quoted, from $400 to $700 per appraisal. Several lenders now have not been able to schedule the appraisals because the appraisal companies or independent appraisers are not willing to fulfill the orders due to the lack in final income paid for the services. In all fairness the appraisal industry has had no increase in income for years. Related costs of title, escrow, underwriting, processing, etc. has all increased over time. However appraisal fee’s have not. And now with the Appraisal Management Companies being mandated this once again takes away from the appraisers income. Further increasing their work load is the new guideline that two current listings have to be included to render final value. This is on top of the normal 3 to 4 closed comparables.

        All in all values have already have begun to come in less than market value, even from a conservative stand point. The question now stands is it because of the lack in pay equaling the lack in research. Regardless of the debate values that are deemed by the human factor will always have questions in the final determined value.

  3. The AMC’s had local appraisers fill out days of paperwork to get on their lists. Why are they are not using local appraisers? They are using out of town appraisers that do not have access to MLS. MLS is crucial information in preparing an appraisal. This will only slow down the housing market even more. The customers think the appraisers are getting rich when they have actually taken a cut in pay. The HVCC is the worst thing that could have been created for the recession. It seems the Certified Appraisers are being punished. The AMC’s are using only licensed and less experienced appraisers just because they will cut their fees lower. Doesn’t anyone care about the quality of the report?? I believe this will finish destroying the housing market. It is also hurting the Certified Appraisers who have put in years and hours of education and experience. It is costing the consumer more money!
    I hope someone will wakeup before this finishes destroying our housing market.
    AMC’s have contacted me by phone. When I tell them I am certified, they say that if I am certified that I probably would not be willing to work for their reduced fees(50%). What does this tell you? Concern for quality or how much the AMC’s can make off of the deal???

  4. I am happy to have found your site. The information is right on and groovy. Keep up the good work and I will keep coming back to visit.

  5. Baron K says:

    Average escrow time has increased in duration. Average has been closer to 45 days. Seems the main hold up is the appraisals.

Speak Your Mind

*